The Life and Times of Anthony Samuelson

with bits and pieces from A Guide to Erotic Art in the National Gallery

Archive for December, 2007

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Lost and Now Found - a Rant about Trouser Roles in Opera

27th December 2007

The following posting was originally put up on the site in July. In the Big Makeover in September it somehow got deleted. The emphasis in these pages has since shifted away from general subjects to Erotic Art in the National Gallery (My Guide thereto) but as Opera is one of my greatest loves I will return to it from time to time.

Today’s rant will be about trouser roles. A subject particularly dear to my heart is the importance of trouser roles being sung by comely singers. I don’t mind a 16 stone Tosca being winched up to the top of a wall so that she can jump off it. I don’t mind a well upholstered Violetta dying in the last act from consumption and I don’t mind a late life Pavarotti prancing around the stage like an elephant on hot bricks in the role of a star-crossed juvenile lover. This is opera, and when Pavarotti goes into “Una Furtiva Lagrima” your ears tell why it does not matter that much.

Trouser roles are, however, something different. They are written with the intention of titillating the males in the audience and say something about the composer’s preferences as well as one’s own. I object strongly to seeing an aging soprano with the face of a horse, angel voiced though she may be, playing a boy. The two sexiest trouser parts in opera are, to my thinking, Cherubino in Marriage of Figaro and Oscar in The Masked Ball. Some opera fanatics with animal sensations capable of being aroused would add a third: Octavian in Rosenkavalier, where the “Mrs Robinson” scenario is like pushing on an open door (double analogy here, in case you missed it) but I don’t like the composer. Richard Strauss was a Nazi toady and no less importantly - although capable of writing a melody - chose not to do so for more than a bar or two at a time. If it was a case of the Devil having the best tunes one would have to take a view. With Richard Strauss the dilemma does not arise.

Maria Ewing, still a beautiful woman
Maria Ewing making her debut as Cherubino in The Marriage of Figaro

Maria Ewing is still a good looking woman but there was a moment in her life when she looked stunningly gorgeous. Peter Hall, who dumped his second wife for her, certainly thought so. In Marriage of Figaro Cherubino is a young love-lorn lad who is writing poems to an older woman. For reasons too long to go into in this blog it becomes necessary for this older woman and another woman, both leading soprano roles, to disguise Cherubino as a girl. So, here you have two grown-up women undressing a young boy, who is really a young girl, and dressing him (her, really) up as a girl. What opera director worth his salt can not make something pretty exciting about that situation? Sadly, most do not.

In The Masked Ball, which has the most beautiful tunes in all opera, Oscar is the page to the King. I saw it on a video played by a black girl, very pretty and with a gamin face, in a performance at the Metropolitan Opera in New York. As written by Verdi the part calls for a characterisation full of verve, personality and bounce. Un-page-to-the King-like, in a nutshell. The Met girl took it further than I have ever seen before and was hitting off her master at every opportunity. The words were same-old libretto but the body language was something else. I have forgotten her name, which says something for the depth of my knowledge about opera, but I know wot I likes. [A few moments with Google suggests that it was probably a singer called Harolyn Blackwell.]

Harolyn Blackwell played Oscar the page in The Masked Ball, hitting off her master at every opportunity

I am very keen on opera having good tunes. The last Masked Ball that I saw was as recent as a week before Hampton Court when Carol and I flew to Belfast to attend a performance at Castleward by a part/amateur part/professional company as guests of our Ulster friends. Castleward is a sort of mini-Glyndebourne with everyone dressed in full evening fig, except me. I was Mr Sartorial Elegance only from the ankles up, a packing blip having resulted in my only having trainers to wear. The Castleward production was excellent entertainment and something in which those involved could justly take pride. The Oscar, was as good with the trousers as most I have seen in the role, none having come close to the little black girl in the New York Met production (as entrancing as Maria Ewing - which is the ultimate accolade). It would be well nigh impossible to render this particular opera in any way that was not a good way to spend an evening. As I said to our friends, if it had been, say, Britten’s The Turn of the Screw, I would have stayed in London and got on with the preparations for Hampton Court.

Benjamin Britten, in my book, is even more execrable than Richard Strauss. Along with his ghastly contemporary Michael Tippett he had a choice about what to do about Hitler and decided to let Hitler get on with it. Britten chose to skip off to Canada. Tippett stayed at home and progressed his career as a composer while other musicians were fighting and dying to save my sort. Both of them are on my list of bodies to be exhumed and reburied with stakes through their heart to make sure that the taxpayer is once and for all liberated from their malign influence. Britten wrote nasty operas, some of them sadistic, some of them paedophilic and all of them incapable of putting bums on seats without raiding the pay packets of shop girls in Bootle. Tippett also made a career of pilfering shop girls’ wages. They don’t do Britten or Tippett at Castleward.

It turned out that Castleward was to provide one of the most memorable operatic experiences in my opera-going life. It came in the closing moments of the last act.

To understand what happened, it is necessary to know a little about the architecture of the venue and the way in which the last act of Masked Ball unfolds. The theatre is a long narrow converted barn that holds about three hundred patrons on an un-raked floor. To compensate, the stage is comprised of a series of steeply stepped surfaces. The orchestra is one fifth in view of the audience, four fifths under the stage. Not so much an auditorium as a funnel laid on its side. The opera concludes with the masked ball of the title, Verdi’s music building-up to the moment when the King gets stabbed by his best friend. This happens a few chords before the end and is marked by a climax in the score in which the entire cast belts out the melody, the voices of the sopranos soaring above the rest. It would not surprise me if even the ushers and toilet attendants were summoned to the wings to add their voices. Then comes an abrupt momentary silence before the music resumes. In Castleward’s acoustic tunnel it was not so much a listening highlight as experiencing blast from a shotgun. I would not, I said to myself, and to my friends, wished to have lived my life without experiencing that moment.

I am not someone who ovates standing. The Americans give standing ovations at the drop of almost any curtain. In London it happens less often but when it does I remain steadfastly in my seat. I came very very near to standing-up at Castleward and, had a single other person in the audience done so, I would have joined them. That no one did shows what an un-reconstructed bunch are the Ulster elite. They see themselves as more British than the rest of us and it shows. I debated whether to go it alone, which would have been quite a statement, but decided that coming from someone wearing full evening dress and trainers it would have been counter productive from the performers’ point of view.

Digression: For the sake of a better understanding of my blogs please note that, while I do not use superlatives lightly, they are not mutually exclusive. In this regard I follow the example of Samuel Pepys who, when he liked something, always said that it was the best he ever saw (or heard) or the best of its kind ever known in the world. Contrary-wise, when he did not like something, it would be the worst ever ever. This being the case, Pepys had to find words to distinguish the best of the best from just the best ever. Thus, the first time he heard a new style wind instrument developed from the recorder, he wrote:

“…but that did which please me beyond anything in the whole world was the wind-musique…which is so sweet that it ravished me really sick, just as I have formerly been when in love with my wife; that neither then, nor all the evening going home and at home, I was able to think of anything, but remained all night transported, so as I could not believe that ever any music hath the real command over the soul of a man as this did upon me.”

Opera has provided several moments that I would not have wished to have lived my life without experiencing - which is my way of saying that I was ravished really sick. Two that come to mind are the first time the curtain came down on Rigoletto (Verdi) and the first time I heard the Hebrew Slaves Chorus in the third act of Nabucco (also Verdi) which luckily for me was in the Verona arena in front of a largely Italian audience made up of people of all ages and walks of life. In Italy this composition is the Song of Freedom. It is Land of Hope and Glory, We’re going to hang out the washing on the Siegfried Line, Land of of My Fathers, I Belong to Glasgow and Danny Boy rolled-up in one. Which underlines a point that I sometimes make to young people that have never been to an opera - which is that they are luckier than me because they still have it all to come. I also tell everyone to avoid being desensitised by listening to opera compilations on CD.

I am now writing on Tuesday 17 July once again en route for Glyndebourne to see Macbeth. Also by Verdi but one without any good tunes (although not as dreary as his later tuneless efforts Otello and Falstaff). What Macbeth lacks in melody, it make up for with lots of drama and blood. This is very much a family occasion with three of my grandchildren among the party. Two of them are aged only 13 and I just hope that it works out well for them. It is not a good opera for comparative beginners but its saving grace is that it is, all said and done, Macbeth.

Trouser roles in Opera – A Rant Revisited.

Googling around in the course of writing my July 23 rant on how much I hated it when opera producers failed to make the best of the erotic potential afforded by trouser roles – a trouser role being a male played by a female singer dressed as a male – I came across a reference to a DVD of the young Maria Ewing playing Cherubino in Mozart’s Marriage of Figaro. The production in question was not a theatrical performance but a film made in 1975 when she was 25 years old. It has been re-issued on DVD and is available on Amazon.com. The director was Jean-Pierre Ponnelle

I love Amazon for the big difference its presence on the Internet has made for my researches into the far reaches of Art. Its “one click shopping” is a modern wonder of the world that I sometimes describe as “click click - knock knock” the first being the sound of the mouse and the second the postman at the door. The two events can be as close in time as 48 hours when I am logged on to amazon.co.uk. The 1975 movie was nowhere to be found on the UK Amazon site and so I had to order it up from amazon.com in America. It arrived the day before yesterday.

For someone looking for an awareness on the part of the director that Mozart had written the role for the delectation of the men in the audience (me among them) this movie delivers Big Time. Ewing approaching 60 is still a looker but, as I have already said, was gorgeous beyond belief in her younger days. There is a character in the Hans Anderson Tinder Box fairytale which goes by the name “the dog with eyes as big as saucers” and in the 1975 movie Ewing’s eyes set in her lovely little gamin face are as big as dinner plates. Someone was watching this girl from Detroit and two years later she made her Met NY debut in the same part. The rest is opera history.

The way director Ponnelle played it, Susanna the housekeeper undresses Cherubino out of shot throwing his clothes , item by item. into a room which the camera is filming. Watching them, and striving to get a better look, is Susanna’s mistress, the Countess, played by Kiri Te Kanawa. Cherubino (a boy played by a girl who is being undressed by a woman) is eventually stark naked and we know it. But by a clever juxtaposition of body and dressmaker’s dummy neither we nor the Countess get to see anything that we ought not to see. For sure, though, if this had been a 1946 live performance at the San Francisco Opera the local cops, who had busted Sally Rand for doing much the same with ostrich feathers, would have rushed in from every corner of the theatre.

You will find dozens of reviews of the 1975 Ponnelle movie on the web, almost all of them ecstatic, but none of them that I have seen mention the way in which the undressing scene is handled. It is all grist to my mill because the sibling to my Guide to Erotic Art in London’s National Gallery (part written) is An Anatomy of Titillation. It is not yet started but will be sooner or later, and so I look out for things.

In my the-trouble-with-trouser-roles rant I referred briefly to the opera Der Rosenkavalier that starts with a love making scene between a strapping young gallant (played by a woman} and a much older woman, wife of a Field Marshall. On satellite on Saturday there was a showing of this opera in which Kiri Te Kanawa (as lovely to look as ever) again plays the older woman. Unfortunately the role of the toyboy lover Octavian was taken by a singer who to my thinking was more like eye-ship’s biscuit than candy. And so although there was a lot of tumbling about on a bed the size of a parking lot it did not compensate for Richard Strauss’s rotten score.

Compensation did come once the gymnastics were out of the way because the work has a good story line and can be played for (and in this production was) laughs. Especially commendable was a bravura performance in the part of Baron Ochs, a horrible old lech slated to marry an innocent young girl fresh out of a convent. Watching it I thought to myself that if our Lana [Lana Clarkson, shot with Phil Spector’s gun] had had the good fortune to have the services of a good writer and a competent director in her attempt at a career as a comedienne she might well have made a decent show reel and it would have been an instant hit and she would not have had to have taken a crummy job at the House of Blues. Sadly, it was not to be; and the rest, once again, is history.

Posted in Opera, Blog of Blogs | 1 Comment »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

An Apology

24th December 2007

A sincere apology to everyone

Over the past few months I have posted some inappropriate pictures and jokes
with a view to interesting readers who I thought shared the same tastes
and sense of humor.

Unfortunately this was not the case and I seem to have upset quite
a few people who have accused me of being sexist and shallow.

If you were one of these people, please accept my sincerest apology.

From now on I will only post material with an
educational content that pays due regard to the sensibilities
of those with the traditional values that come from a deep understanding
of our cultural heritage.

Below is a picture of the Pont Neuf Bridge in Paris .

P. S. For those of you who are interested, Pont Neuf is the oldest bridge
In Paris and took 26 years to build. Construction began in 1578 and
Ended in 1604. ‘Le Pont Neuf’ is actually made of two independent bridges,
One with seven arches and the other with five arches.

A photograph of the Pont Neuf in Paris

With acknowledgments to whoever thought this up in the first place, and to my step-daughter Wendy who sent the original version to me a few days ago.

Posted in Blog of Blogs, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Chelsea and Hampton Court Flower Shows - a retrospective (sort of)

18th December 2007

For anyone interested (and for the Posterity that has, as George Bernard Shaw pointed out, no vote) I am putting up two illustrated articles that between them tell much of the story of my efforts at these two shows.

Chelsea Flower Show 2007, Anthony Samuelson’s Patio Povera
Hampton Court Flower Show 2007, Anthony Samuelson’s The Past is Another Country

On the eve of the Chelsea Flower Show Saga magazine published a feature article about me which is here: Chelsea Flower Show, Saga Magazine, Anthony Samuelson.

For the Hampton Court Flower Show
my sponsor Prudential Insurance produced a brochure. which is here: Hampton Court Flower Show, Anthony Samuelson, Prudential brochure

Click on thumbnail images (left) to see larger versions.

Both the Saga magazine article and the Prudential’s brochure for Hampton Court benefit from the independently-minded insights of the brilliant writer James Alexander-Sinclair. He has a web site devoted to garden and landscape design that can be found here. James sent me a very amusing Christmas card (the digital sort) that is here: 08-ostriches-chirping.mp3 James says that he thinks it might be festive Ostriches singing Hark the Herald Angels Sing, but it could just as easily be a cover of Shakin’ Stevens’ Blue Christmas.

Whenever I was asked whether I would do another flower show and I always replied: No. I said that 2007 would be my one and only year. This remains the case. There will, however, be a book all about my experiences in the world of gardening in due course.

Posted in Hampton Court Flower Show, Blog of Blogs, Chelsea Flower Show | 1 Comment »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

The Marriage Settlement - The first painting in the National Gallery’s Marriage a La Mode and Hogarth’s missed opportunity

16th December 2007

Hogarth Marriage a La Mode The Marriage Settlement aka The Marriage Contract

A part of my follow-up game plan for the already completed (but in need of a publisher) Ten Sexiest Moments in Mythology is a series of further titles along similar lines. Thus: Ten Sexiest Moments in Art, ditto …History, ditto …Television, …the Movies, …Ancient Greecene, …Ancient Rome, ……Cyberspace,…Advertising, etc., etc.. I keep a list of possible titles to which I add from time to time when another one occurs to me. At the moment the total possible titles identified by me stands at 37.

In the areas of human endeavour listed above I have omitted to mention the most prolific, best known, and therefore most obvious source for sexy moments: the Bible. It runs a close second to mythology for extraordinary tales of human and extra-human sexuality and as the author of the Moralized Ovid recognized, even the most kinky deeds of the most lascivious characters in Greek and Biblical legend can be laundered into role models for the Christian faithful. “Prefigure” is the verb that, alchemy fashion, turns base sexual misconduct into golden examples of piety.

This train of thought was set in motion by a consideration of the picture-within-the-picture paintings on view in Hogarth’s Marriage Settlement which is the first painting in the National Gallery’s Marriage a La Mode series. In my desire to get to the picture behind a curtain in the second painting (the Tete a Tete) as quickly as possible I leap-frogged the first painting. Most of the pictures-within-pictures in the Marriage Settlement are monumentally dull and it needs an especially febrile imagination to find a sex angle. It can be argued that as the setting is in Lord Squander’s palatial mansion the choice of pictures hanging on the walls has to reflect his Lordship’s taste as well as serving to drive the narrative forward. I do not think this stacks up because one the pictures in the Marriage Settlement is the very very sexy Judith in the tent of Holofernes and in the fourth painting La Toilette we will find Lot and his Daughters both of which stories are shoe-ins for the Ten Sexiest Moments in the Bible. So why not, Mr Hogarth, some more of the same?

The life of King David provided many opportunities for erotic art but killing Goliath was not one of them unless, as we shall presently see, you have the balls of a Donatello. (I could, perhaps, have worded this better.) Instead of David killing Goliath Hogarth could have given us David and Bathsheba, David and Jonathan, the Rape by one of David’s sons of his daughter Tamnar, David gathering 200 Philistine foreskins or David and Abishag. The last two subjects have gone entirely unnoticed by artists. While the harvesting of foreskins in order to obtain the hand in marriage of King Saul’s daughter would not be a turn-on for most people (but might have made a good Bateman cartoon) I find it extraordinary that the story of Abishag (a personal favourite) has been overlooked by the Old Masters.

Abishag, named kind of Happy Families style, was a young girl who was put into the old King’s bed when he was dying to warm him up. To no avail, the Bible tells us, but it was worth a try. Using what resources are available (that do not include any benefit derived from having been trained to draw) I have done what I can to fill this quite serious gap in the erotic canon.

David and Abishag

Abishag was a Shunamite and she gave her name to a form geriatric therapy involving the application of a young virgin to the affected parts: Shunamitism. Among doctors who prescribed Shunamitism for their patients were the “Father of English Medicine” Thomas Sydenham and the great Dutch physician Hermann Boerhaave, both of whose teachings carried great weight in Hogarth’s time. I do not doubt that Hogarth prescribed the treatment for himself in his declining years. And, since everyone who writes about Marriage a La Mode is prone to express outlandish opinions about what is going on in the pictures, how about an interpretation of The Inspection which has the young viscount acquiring the young girl for his aged father? The “inspection” in the title of the picture – which causes so many problems with commentators - could be him inspecting her to see if she was suitable. The pills could be aphrodisiac pills. This still leaves open the question of what the old tab is doing with the scalpel and my surmise that it was an instrument of abortion is, on that account, the more credible. Hogarth had no love for the Jews and although he derided the Squander family for its philistine taste in furnishings and pictures I think that we can dismiss any idea that the young lord had gone to the surgery to be circumcised. (And see postscript, below).

In theory, when therapeutic Shumanitism was being medically administered as a life-prolonging treatment (and no doubt often in practice), intercourse did not occur. I recollect that there was a similar arrangement in place around about the eleventh and twelfth centuries. In what was known as Courtly Love young knights pledged their love for the high born wives of their feudal lords and to prove it lay with them naked in bed without making any kind of sexual advance. Wandering troubadours apparently provided a similar service. I have a note that the Royal Marines , as part of their community outreach, are always willing to make available their strapping young soldiers as ladies’ escorts and guarantee that there will be no hanky panky. We have, says a spokesman for the Corps, had no complaints.

David and Goliath, David and Jonathan

The relationship between David and Jonathan which, whatever anyone wishes to maintain to the contrary, has a sexual element has not wanted artistic endorsement and if Hogarth had felt like making the point, via a picture on the wall, he could have based it either on the National Gallery’s David and Jonathan by Cima da Conegliano (with the bonus of Goliath’s Hagrid-like severed head and Jonathan’s nobly knees). Or, better yet, Donatello’s David. This bronze statue, the first to depict the nude male for a thousand years, shows David with his foot on Goliath’s helmeted, unattached head. According to the Encyclopedia of gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and queer culture the feathered plum on the helmet rises erotically up the inside of the naked boy’s thigh toward his buttocks. This suggests, say the article, iconographically, that Goliath was killed by his desire for the beautiful boy. However, as a subject for a picture in the picture it would not have suited Hogarth’s purpose, as evidenced in La Toilette, of denigrating homosexuals and effete behaviour generally. A decapitation picture will always draw attention (as I said in a previous posting - the National Gallery loves them) but the detail on Hogarth’s painting is so small as to make one wonder whether the exercise served any purpose beyond reenforcing the interior décor’s role as a harbinger of future events. Like the music in the film Jaws. Similarly some of the other pictures-within-the-picture in The Marriage Settlement: Saint Sebastian, shot-through with arrows for being gay, the snake-haired Medusa, Cain slaying Abel, poor old Tityus having his liver pecked out in perpetuity by a vulture (“straightforwardly horrible” says my guru Judy Egerton), Saint Agnes having her throat cut in a brothel (to get round a Roman law which withheld capital punishment from virgins) and Saint Lawrence roasted to death over hot coals and usually seen, happy porker fashion, carrying a gridiron.

Saint Lawrence - by right of having been in charge of the Vatican library before his martydom - is the Patron Saint of librarians. Roman Catholic doctrine permits its Saints to take on more than one patronage and I think that the gridiron connection ought to qualify him for Patron Saint of American football players, where a vacancy exists. There would be the problem that you would have both teams invoking his assistance before and during matches - but they pray anyway – which is yet another instance of the triumph of hope over experience. How did University of Michigan feel about God’s love for his creatures great and small after their 34-32 defeat by Apallachian State? Where was God when the Baltimore Ravens Defence Co-ordinator called a timeout a nana-second before his team would otherwise have had the game against the almighty New England Patriots miraculously won?

The Hollow Planet by the Schuiten Brothers published in the magazine Heavy Metal
Saint Lawrence - a detail from a National Gallery painting by Hans Memling

Mention of Saint Lawrence and his Happy Porker gridiron brings back another memory of Death by Gridiron. It was a story that appeared in the Heavy Metal comic, brilliantly illustrated like most stories in Heavy Metal. This one is called The Hollow Planet and by the Brothers Schuiten. Their speciality is parallel universes that are bizarre but have an uncanny architectural and engineering logic about them. We are in Zara which is one of the worlds of a system known as the Hollow Grounds. Each world has its own unique characteristic. Zara is two worlds in one in which a race of women cling to the surface of a non-moving sphere while across a great chasm an outer sphere continually turns. The women need men only for the purpose of procreation and are delighted with the arrival of a raiding party from a more advanced civilisation - who see the women as a soft target - which gives the Zara ladies the opportunity to acquire new inseminators.

The women have adapted to life in a vertical plane on Zara by imitating spider like insects who spin webs and build nests. In the manner of comic art, however, they are well endowed in all the departments that men on Planet Earth find sexually irresistible and are not constrained by notions of modesty. They are bright, too, and using their territorial savvy it is a simple matter for them to capture the men who have invaded their world thereby dashing their hopes of a pleasant orgy of rape and murder.

The story is told through the eyes of Nelle, a native of Zara, and Olivia who has come from another world somewhat like our own. For the benefit of Nelle and the other girls Olivia mentally projects images of life on her planet which show men with what seem to Nelle and her friends to be vine like objects hanging from their stomachs but which are, in reality, penises. The Zara girls are amazed when Olivia goes on to project images showing them what the “vines” are used for. “It must be wonderful to be vined by one of those,” says one of the girls, wistfully - never dreaming that her wish will soon be realised.

The elders decide that the captured men will not be used up all at once but made to last as long as possible. They start with the leader of the group. Olivia is shocked to see girls siting astride him on an iron rack shaped like a gridiron and having sex with him in the centre of a pod shaped amphitheatre with all the other girls looking down from benches around the steep sides. YES!! screams the girl at the head of the line in the moment of orgasm. “In my world,” says Olivia, “we have intercourse in a very discreet fashion.”

Meanwhile the man’s companions remain strung-up in the rafters awaiting their turn. Nelle explains to Olivia that in order to bring about a perfect symbiosis between their way of life and their planet they have had to adopt all the customs of the insects - one of which is to spin a web to capture a male. Olivia, who knows what the insects do to the males during intercourse, says “You can’t really be saying that you copy all their behaviours?” “Of course we do!” replies Nelle. “Otherwise we would not achieve the symbiotic balance we are looking for.”

(”Much Later…”) the story reaches its grisly climax. The man is on the grid being barbecued over a flaming fire and the Zara girls are savouring the aroma and licking their lips in anticipation of the meal to come. This leaves on the reader’s mind a lingering uncertainty. Does the next man on the iron grid, knowing the fate that awaits him, with a voluptious lass straddling his loins get an erection? Or not?

We are now into female-on-male rape, a subject that deserves a posting all on its own and will get one in due course. Art is not without examples of such role reversal: The stories of Selene and Endymion and of Aurora and Cephalus are both featured in the Ten Sexiest Moments in Mythology. Under today’s definition of informed consent Judith and Holofernes is arguably another such case. It is one of two pictures within the Marriage Settlement not yet discussed. The second picture-within-a-picture not previously mentioned is on the ceiling and only partly in view. It is Pharoah drowning in the Red Sea. Too boring to dwell on. If Hogarth had wanted an Egyptian story he would have done better to have chosen Joseph and Potiphar’s Wife in which Joseph, being jumped on by Mrs P, is a victim of female-on-male attempted rape. Both Judith and Potiphar’s wife have to be strongly fancied to make it into the Bible’s top erotic ten. The story of the Jewish heroine Judith and her encounter with the Captain of the enemy host Holofernes, in which Judith came off best, will be the subject of my next Horrible Hogarth posting.

Postscript. While this posting was in draft I came across the web site of a seller of fine prints whose spin on Hogarth’s The Inspection was that he was asking the doctor to tell him which of the two females depicted had given him syphilis! Could it be that print sellers have to have the same ingenious descriptive abilities for which estate agents are famous?

Posted in The Horrible Hogarth, Blog of Blogs | 2 Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

“I am thy Abishag”

14th December 2007

David and Abishag per Anitole France

This was the famous French satyrical novelist Anitole France telling a story about the temptation suffered by an elderly priest in his book Penguin Island.The king was not someone conjured up in the author’s mind and he was no ordinary king. He was the King David of Bible fame. And there really was a young Shunamite girl called Abishag. Meet them both in my next posting.

Posted in Blog of Blogs | No Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

NEVER MIND THE FAT FUCK - IT’S THE MESSAGE THAT COUNTS!

10th December 2007

toilette-and-me.gif

Or so the Horrible Hogarth would have us all believe. It seems to me that as the National Gallery’s Marriage a La Mode progresses from scene to scene Hogarth’s “allusive technique” (as Robert Cowley calls it) gets steadily more tacky. I might have used the word “obscene” but that would be to risk an accusation of the pot calling the kettle black.

I spent so much time with the previous painting, No 3 in the series, The Inspection, that something of the sleaziness with which it is pervaded seems to be sticking to me. Hogarth and his many art historian and critic groupies maintain that the end justifies the means. This reminds me of George Carlin’s account about what he would do if he was involved in a plane crash. “I’ll go around the fat fuck,” said the American comedian, “Step on the widow’s head. Push those children out of the way. Knock down the paralyzed midget and get out of the plane – so I can help others!” Hogarth managed to fill his portrayals of low life, which he promoted as “modern moral subjects”, with titillating detail and when he turned his attention to the high life of the aristocracy as we see it in the National Gallery’s six part Marriage a La Mode (1743) he pretended to have replaced the prurience of his earlier Harlot’s Progress (1731) and Rake’s Progress (1732) with an approach in which he promised to take particular care that there would not “be the least Objection to the Decency or Elegancy of the whole work.” As we have seen - and as the fat fuck, widow, children and paralyzed midget will confirm - these were empty words.

The National Gallery’s Ganymede by Mazza (also Michelangelo and Hogarth)

On arriving at the fourth painting, La Toilette, I discover that not only is Hogarth still laying on the innuendos, double meanings and nudges and winks with a trowel but Robert Cowley in his 1983 magnum opus of a book. goes to ever more extraordinary (and in my humble opinion often untenable) lengths to demonstrate the ingenious ways in which Hogarth used images to convey a narrative. It would be wrong to suggest that, as a result, Hogarth would be turning in his grave. On the contrary, he would, I feel sure, be shaking with laughter.

My guru, Judy Egerton is apt to stray along the same path but hers are day trips in comparison with Cowley’s excursions to the moon.

Once again it’s picture-within-the-picture time. In La Toilette there are six - including the masquerade scene on the screen – in all. Leda and the Swan(seen on a salver in the lower right hand corner of the National Gallery’s painting) got a good going over in my posting of 22 October and there is nothing more to be said beyond re-emphasising that – all said and done – it is a story about bestiality.

There is more bestiality on view in the painting on the left of the picture which shows the Rape of Ganymede (“rape” as I have mentioned before meaning the act of abduction rather than the rape to come). Ganymede’s job description, once he reached Mount Olympus, was cup-bearer to the gods. If, however, you google the words ganymede and gay the result is a respectable, if that is the right word, 77,000 hits. The question here, of course, is what if anything was Hogarth trying to say to his audience about the mismatched couple at the centre of his drama and about the company that they keep?

Inadvertently, perhaps, Hogarth tells us something about himself. He is not into homosexuality and buttocks, whether on boys or girls, do nothing for him. I say this because the artists of the Renaissance had three ways of showing how Jupiter – on this occasion disguised as an eagle - transported Ganymede up to Olympus: 1) Grasped by and with his back to the eagle; 2) grasped by and facing the eagle and with his back to the viewer; and 3) dangling any old how from underneath the eagle. Michelangelo’s portrayal, on which Hogarth based his picture on the wall, broke what was for Michelangelo’s time new ground by showing the eagle pressing hard against the boy’s naked buttocks, thereby treating viewers both to an image that combined buggery with bestiality and to an eyeful of prepubescent genitalia. According to James M Saslow, whose Ganymede in the Renaissance was one of the first books bought by me from the Shelf L’Enfer at the Atrium bookshop of blessed memory, there are psychologically oriented commentators who think that Michelangelo intended to show female labia from which protrudes the eagle’s penis piercing him from the rear. The logic behind this ghastly thought being, presumably, that the boy will not be needing his tackle any more.

Ganymede in Hogarth’s Marriage a La Mode - La Toilette
la

The detail on Hogarth’s version is insufficient for anyone to say whether he bought into this curious interpretation of the great master’s drawing but both Robert Cowley and Guru Judy think that the close proximity of the eagle’s beak to the boy’s genitals bode ill. Ms Egerton points out that the picture is located just behind the castrato singer and the eagle’s beak is dangerously lowered “as if one quick snap will result in castration if Ganymede resists.” Cowley had previously made the same point along with a bonus quote from the German polymath Georg Christoph Lichtenberg commenting on the engravings of Hogarth’s paintings some half a century after they were published. It was Lichtenberg’s opinion that “the eagle would have the singer too “. (There is, by the way, a little of Lichtenberg in the lives of everyone living outside the United States and Canada. The standardised paper system based upon A4 was his idea.) David Bindman, the third Hogarthian expert on whose words I hang, has a neat phrase to the effect that the Ganymede painting “refers covertly to the sexual proclivities of the epicene foreigners beneath.” I first came across the word “epicene” in something the English art critic Brian Sewell wrote and had to look it up. In the interim I had forgotten what it meant and had to look it up again. It comes from the Greek epikoinos meaning “common to” which in turn comes from epi-, “upon” + koinos, “common.” Today it is used to denote bisexuality or no sexuality at all. But you knew that, didn’t you?

Too much time spent with the Horrible Hogarth leaves one with a definite epicene feeling. And I do not mean bi-sexual.

There is a lot more to be said about Hogarth’s La Toilette and next up will be another picture-within-a-picture which is the painting of the Biblical celebrity Lot with his daughters which hangs above her ladyship’s lover, lawyer Silvertongue. (Her father-in-law has now died and it is “Lord and Lady Squander” from now on.) In my view the story of Lot and his Daughters is one of the most fun subjects in all art and I have been looking forward to it since I started on Marriage a La Mode.

Posted in The Horrible Hogarth, Blog of Blogs | No Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

London Bridge “Art-iz-Us” Artistic Happening on 29 May 1998 (which led to multiple nominations for the Turner Prize). Here are your emails.

6th December 2007

London Bridge “Art-iz-Us” Artistic Happening on 29 May 1998

This posting relates to an artistic happening that took place on London Bridge on 29 May 1998. There is a previous posting with an article from Antiques and Art Independent telling the story of the Happening here.

On the day a large number of commuters walking over the bridge donned cardboard ears bearing the words Art-iz-Us and were nominated for the Turner Prize. An important part of the preparation for the event was the setting up of a dedicated web site: www.londonbridge.29may.com. In 1998 this was a very novel approach - as, indeed, were the multiple Turner Prize nominations.

The web site advertised the coming artistic happening and commuters walking over the bridge every morning were advised where to log on by means of posters. In 1998 most computers were in offices and many people did not have one at home. Almost by definition, most of the 2000 + hits on the site came from offices in the City of London.

The web site generated an extensive and heady email correspondence which I downloaded to my hard disk just before the web site ceased to exist. In those days the word “gigabyte” for most of us was beyond contemplation and it was necessary to download files from the computer at regular intervals onto other media to create working memory. The chosen State-of-the-then-Art device was called Syquest and anyone who has had any experience of Syquest will know how awful the technology was and how hit and miss any back-up on Syquest proved to be. By the same token it was necessary to keep web files as light as possible so that they could be downloaded in a reasonably short space of time. For this reason there are two correspondence files. The first covers the build-up to the Happening when we (me and the people walking over London Bridge) were all getting very excited and the second begins a couple of days after the great moment when we were coming down from a high.

The tenth anniversary of the Happening will be next May. In anticipation I am going to put together a file of ephemera, pictures and press cuttings which will be posted here in due course. Who knows? Perhaps there will be a re-union.

First correspondence file:www.londonbridge.29may.com - Correspondence File to end May 1998
Second correspondence file:www.londonbridge.29may.com - Correspondence File June to September 1998

There is a BBC report of the happening published on its web site later the same day here (with two further broadcast links within the article)

Posted in Blog of Blogs, Earing-up of London Bridge | No Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

AND WHAT OF OLD GROPEY? Concluding remarks on Hogarth’s third picture, “The Inspection”, in the National Gallery’s “Marriage a La Mode”.

4th December 2007

Hogarth’s Marriage a La Mode Plate III The Inspection

As I recorded in my posting of 24th ultimo I did not feel able to put the third picture in Hogarth’s Marriage a La Mode to bed without first seeing what Robert Cowley had to say in his much admired comprehensive study of the paintings published in 1983. (Robert L.S. Cowley. Marriage A-La-Mode – a re-view of Hogarth’s narrative art. Manchester University Press.) My Amazon one-click/postman’s knock copy has a large rubber stamp next to the contents page which shows that it has been either de-accessioned or liberated from Gwansanaeth Llyfrgell Clwyd, otherwise known as the Clwyd Library Service. Since the book is written in English there may not have been many readers who understood it, I suppose. Or may be the Chief Librarian took a dim view of Cowley’s omission to deal fully with the two points relating to the Horrible Hogarth’s third picture, The Inspection, on which I too was specifically looking to be enlightened.

Hogarth’s Marriage a La Mode Plate III The Inspection - the skeleton groping the ecorche, front and back views schematically represented.

Robert Cowley’s failure to discuss the weird and unwholesome image of a skeleton doing what I think is a double handed grope on the ecorche is out of kinter with the generally very extensive and at times erudite analysis of the six paintings. Actually, I cannot speak for what is written about pictures numbers 1, 2, and 4, 5, and 6 which I have not yet had time go through, but I have read both the Introduction, and what he has to say about picture number 3, The Inspection, three times. He seems to have almost totally ignored the necrophilic necking going on inside the open cupboard in the background to the painting. The lack of an index to the book, as I have previously mentioned, is unhelpful.

It is widely accepted among art historians that the skeleton is kissing the ecorche and fondling his crotch but I go further by expressing the view that Hogarth intends us to mentally position the skeleton’s other hand on the ecorche’s bottom. I have not been able to find anyone else of the same view. It would alleviate my loneliness if there was some academic confirmation of what I think is happening in the picture as detailed in the schematic drawings. In due course I will ask to see the National Gallery’s X-rays to ascertain if they bear out what is shown in my drawings.

Robert Cowley (whose word for the ecorche is “muscleman”) is quite helpful, although just a bit wobbly, on the other point on which I am out on my own, which is what Hogarth meant when he called this painting The Inspection. My belief is that the pathetic little tot is there to be inspected and most likely to be subjected to an abortion, this being the purpose of the sharp instrument held in the bawd’s right hand. The child is wearing a dress in a style that could conceal early stage pregnancy. Everyone assumes that the boxes of pills are mercury pills for treating syphilis but one or both of them could just as easily be an abortificant that has not worked. The word “abortificant” combined with “hogarth” is a constructive googlewhack (see entry in the Glossary here) and so once again I am out on my own.

On the subject of the purpose of the knife Cowley infers one thing and then another. “The intention behind the knife, a folding scalpel or bistoury,” he says, “remains to be explained.” There is no evidence that it is intended for surgery so that the tall woman, a haughty person, he says, appears to have snatched up a convenient weapon in response to the Viscount’s criticisms. But in the next paragraph he says that the doctor is polishing his spectacles “in readiness for an inspection which can only lead to more pain.” (A bistoury is a long narrow surgical knife. You can be forgiven for not knowing. I myself had never heard the word before.)

Hogarth’s Marriage a La Mode Plate III The Inspection - The girl and the cork-screw

At this point Cowley starts a protracted exercise in which he not only counts how many angels can dance on the head of a pin but what is the significance of where they are on the head of the pin in relation to the other dancing angels. It makes the book a hard read with page upon page playing chicken with the ridiculous. After half a dozen such pages we reach a bit about the traction machine and the corkscrew machines invented by the doctor which can be seen on the right hand side of the painting and which, per Cowley, add meanings to other parts of the picture and the relationship between the viscount and his “puny mistress”. The suggestion, says Cowley, is that she is to be “held and pierced by the cork screw which overlaps her skirts.” Cowley adds that the analogy between the bottle and the anaemic girl is reinforced by the fact that gin was used medicinally to relieve menstrual pain. I consulted the senior Medical Officer of the Royal Marines about this and he confirmed that the reason for the heavy consumption of gin in former times was the high incidence of menstrual pain consequent upon a reduction in the number of pregnancies as a result of adverse effect on the male libido of the work of artists like Hogarth. (For information on the expertise of the Royal Marines in art matters see Glossary Gloss here.)

A couple of pages later Cowley is arguing that the interaction of hands and arms creates an uneven movement across the line of the picture and eventually (after a leg-bone-connected-to-the-thigh-bone succession of sentences) reaches the procuress’s arm, travels along the scalpel towards the doctor and comes to a resting point on his spectacles. This chain of connections, says Cowley, unifies the tableau and offers the underlying suggestion that the doctor is eventually to “inspect” the common miss. (“Common miss” being a euphemism for an underage prostitute.)

Somewhere in all this, the skeleton and the “muscleman” get a couple of sentences. The word “caress” is used for “grope” and “whispers in his ear” substitutes for “kisses”. The relationship between these two, Cowley thinks, implies that Hogarth’s mildly resentful Viscount is also experiencing the first caress of a contagious death.

While I have spared my readers most of the chapter’s convoluted arguments and assumptions and speculations I do not want to look a gift horse in the mouth. Alone among the commentators on Hogarth’s third picture in the Marriage a La Mode series Robert Cowley accepts that “inspection” means “inspection”. He also says that the painting is full of lewd jokes – and how often does anyone writing about the Horrible Hogarth come out with that?

End piece.

If you were a follower of the Phil Spector trial, what does the skeleton nuzzling the skinned man remind you of? The image of Linda Kenney Baden and her client is what comes into my mind.

Defence Counsel Linda Kenney Baden with client Phil Spector

Posted in The Horrible Hogarth, Blog of Blogs | 2 Comments »