The Life and Times of Anthony Samuelson

with bits and pieces from A Guide to Erotic Art in the National Gallery

Archive for the 'Spector Trial' Category

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

SPROCKET’S TRIALS & TRIBULATIONS HITS THE HEADLINES. (AGAIN!)

29th January 2008

I am not sure whether or not this will come as news to the Spector Trial blogging community. This morning by snailmail from the United States comes the January issue of ABAJournal, a magazine published by the American Bar Association. It is addressed, c/o my home, to my youngest son who recently completed law school in the USA and is now back here in the UK. It contains a six page feature article entitled Full Court Coverage by Stephanie Francis Ward which kicks off with a quote from Betsy Ross (Sprocket) and goes on to describe the impact that her writing has had on the trial.

The domestic matters to which I referred in my last posting continue to monopolise my every waking hour. I have not yet had time to read the article from end to end but I can see that Sprocket gets mentioned many times. I have done a quick google and, so far as I can see, the article has had very little currency on the web. Neither can I find a reference to it on the Trials & Tribulations web site. This is strange but, fortunately, the one thing that has turned up on the Internet is the article itself which is well worth reading if you happen to be a follower of Phil Spector’s dealings with the Justice system. It can be found here.

I have to return to the domestic matters that are no less pressing now than they were three weeks ago. I have a good feeling when I read articles like that in the ABAJournal because I have always said that Trials and Tribulations and The Darwin Experience are, in their different ways, very exceptional examples of trial reportage. In any future history of the evolution of the Media they will get more than a footnote.

Posted in Spector Trial, Blog of Blogs | No Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Mr Spector! Call a Cab!

4th October 2007

The news is that Phil Spector is going to be tried again and has to put together a new team of lawyers. I offer myself as lead Counsel at his next trial. I do not care whether he is guilty or innocent. I will defend him to the best of my ability.

By sheer amazing co-incidence I explained in my last posting - which was supposed to be all about the Royal Marines and how they took great umbrage at Kim’s DarwinException shedding doubt on Linda’s timely illness, just when hubby was about to take the stand - that the English criminal defence system requires a member of the Bar to accept a brief from whoever turns up at the door of his chambers. It is not the barrister’s role, the convention has it, to decide the question of guilt or innocence – which is what would be happening if they only took briefs for those who they believed innocent of the charges against them. Barristers are thus like cabs on a rank waiting for customers. And so it is called just that: the cab rank system. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Spector Trial, Blog of Blogs | 7 Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Dedicated Trial Watcher misses Jury’s Non-Verdict

27th September 2007

Another BIG SCOOP from Sprocket

Me and Beth Karas

Late Breaking news from DarwinException


Having been more or less glued to my computer for the past fortnight waiting for the Spector Jury to come back with some kind of conclusion to their deliberations I managed to miss the events of yesterday afternoon in the courtroom in Los Angeles. I got the news of a mistrial like most people in the discovered world by reading it in my daily newspaper which hits my letterbox about 7am London Time.

How I came to miss the result I shall never know. I was keeping my eye on the Court Television regular programme via the Sling softwear attached to my youngest son’s cable in Ohio. I was refreshing, when I remembered to, CourtTV’s so called “live” video feed over the Internet (which is like playing pat ball with a jelly fish) and before going to bed I checked the headlines on Google News and there was nothing there.

lgb-and-friend3.gif

There was nothing also on the Toledo Blade’s web side where I went in search of news about the Ohio State’s very able third string quarterback Antonio Henton who had had his collar felt (as we say over here) in a soliciting-a-prostitute sting. (Which goes to show where the police in Columbus Ohio think their priorities lie.) I don’t remember whether I took my usual bed time glance at the Drudge Report but, if I did, there was nothing there.

I was quite tired yesterday evening having been to the hospital with Carol earlier. I had decided to spend what was left of the day in getting together the illustrations and my previous writings about the Horrible Hogarth for my next extract from my coming Guide to Erotic Art in London’s National Gallery. This involved some tedious searching through more than a terabyte of hard disk and I kept dozing off to sleep – which does not say much for my previous writings on the subject. I had to break off to make some supper which was Chili Con Carne with rice. I started with the contents of a tin of Stagg brand “Dynamite Hot” Chili Con Carne and largely defused it with a can of Heinz Baked Beans, a can of Red Kidney Beans in Water, spoonfuls of Tomato Ragu and a slurp of Tomato Ketchup. I heated the resulting brown sludge to boiling point and stirred it with wooden spoon constantly for ten minutes. The result was edible, Carol and I thought. It was, however, still unbearably hot in places. So when they said “Dynamite” they were not exaggerating.

Thus it happened that - having more or less closely followed and commented on the twists and turns in Spector Trial - I miss the big one! This leaves me with two choices. I could pretend that I was there for it. By “there” I mean watching it unfold on my computer monitor from a distance of 5460 miles. Or I could say that I did not wish to comment on the outcome of the trial until I had the opportunity for mature reflection.

As regards the first option, I remember a story about a group of sports correspondents watching a very dull cricket match in which nothing was happening at all. Cricket as a spectator sport is, at best, like watching paint dry. These journalists all go off for a heavy lunch break to a pub down the road and get back fifteen minutes after the restart of play during which time four wickets have fallen. Notwithstanding that they had not been there, their newspapers were filled with graphic accounts of the after lunch drama. Blogging ethics do not permit me to avail myself of this first option.

As regards the second option, I had already called the result as a mistrial in an earlier posting. All I will say now (having been proved right, which is no big deal as it was almost certain that that was what was going to happen) is that I would think that – provided always that he has the money for another prolonged trial defence - it is highly unlikely that Phil will go for a plea bargain unless it requires pleading guilty to a very minor offence. Such as, for example, encompassing the employment of an illegal immigrant as a private hire car driver. Or washing his hands in the toilet. Or some such.

In the process of catching-up on yesterday’s developments I watched the video (here) of the latest update from CourtTV’s Beth Karas who, as everyone knows, is a very able and very lovely young woman. She is also, I would venture to suggest, in line for the title of World Champion Eyelash Batter. What brought this thought on is a passage in the latest Harry Potter book (the tape of which Carol and I were listening to in the car to and from the hospital). We had got to the bit where the stunningly beautiful Fleur Delacour is marrying Bill Weasley and, arriving at the wedding as a bridesmaid, her younger and equally beautiful sister Gabrielle aged 11 “bats her eyelashes” (as J.K.Rowling puts it) at the 17 year old Harry Potter - which does not go down well with Harry’s girlfriend Ginny.beth-close-up2.jpg I don’t know who Beth’s significant other is, but he should just see how Beth bats her eyelashes at this old guy in England.

Now to Sprocket’s Scoop. If you are interested in the phenomenon of blogging qua blogging you just have to look at her latest few postings which are here. They record her conversations with Juror Number Nine. This Juror argued strongly for a conviction and the moment his part in the trial was over and done with he is on the phone to Sprocket. Sprocket, in what may be a Mandy Rice Davis moment, says that he emailed her at the suggestion of a friend. This is how the posting begins:

    Juror #9 found out about my blog from a friend of his who emailed the url to him, and told him that he needed to look at this blog. Juror #9 emailed me at my blog telling me that I got it wrong. Juror #3 was NOT the not guilty vote; it was Juror #1. He also included his phone number and told me to call him.

Etc, Etc.

I understand that the Royal Marines (see my Glossary of Art Terms) are thinking about putting out a statement to reassure anyone with a suspicious mind that they have no doubt whatsoever that the friend with the url never mentioned Sprocket, her blog, blogging, the internet, the trial or anything other than the result of the Appalachian State versus Michigan game with Juror Number Nine until ten minutes after the end of the trial.

Sprocket is over the moon with her scoop, as would be anyone. It is not the first time she has been ahead of the trial reporting game. See my posting of 9 August that I have not yet got round to transferring to the Spector category on this site.

Late Breaking News from DarwinException

I have taken advantage of the facility on Kim’s DarwinException blog to have her postings emailed to me as soon as they happen. As I was putting this one of mine to bed there came through an account by her of email/telephone conversations with two more of the jurors. (Here.) Like everything Kim writes, it is thoughtful and deep. Kim’s approach compared to Sprocket’s is very contrasting but, like broadsheet newspapers and red top tabloids, both have their place in the scheme of things.

Perhaps not wishing to attract the unsolicited attention of the Royal Marines, Kim’s jurors decided to remain anonymous. They were quick to get their two penn’orth in on her blog, however.

Posted in Spector Trial, Blog of Blogs | 12 Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Would Judge Fidler look better with hair? You decide.

21st September 2007

fidler-spector_31.jpg

Posted in Spector Trial, Blog of Blogs | 11 Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Two Deads and a half

21st September 2007

Friday 00.50

I posted yesterday my view that the Spector trial was “Dead Dead Dead” and that what we were seeing was agonal gasping from a putrifying corpse. Since then Judge Fidler has carried on a one-man fight to breath life back into the prosecution’s case - with no help, so far as I could see, from prosecuter Alan Jackson, let alone the Brain-in-a-Speaker-Phone now appearing for the defence.

Kim’s DarwinException account of yesterday’s proceedings was absolutely masterly and I wish it to be known that, should she decide to return to the law, I would be very willing to clerk for her. To further my application I submit a 1950 newspaper report of one of my early cases.

05-12-14-01-soldier-press-cutting.jpg

This site is under reconstruction and, in Eugene O’Neill’s immortal phrase, in a terrible state of chassis. It will get better, I promise

Posted in Spector Trial, Blog of Blogs, The Jurassic Age | No Comments »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Primate Tests for Blood Spatter

19th September 2007

The following are extracts from postings relating to the Phil Spector trial putting forward the case for resolving the issue of how far blood will spatter from a gunshot wound to the head by tests on non-human primates. The order is chronological with the earliest postings first.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Spector Trial | 1 Comment »

Print This Post Print This Post Email This Post Email This Post

Bay Watch - first posted on 6 August 2007

18th September 2007

Be nice to the people you meet in the elevator going up

Because they may be the same people that you meet in the elevator going down.

This old saw came to mind when the story of Lana Clarkson coming back from a party weeping got a second going-over today. (Yesterday, London Time)

The chatrooms and blogs are alive with sound of Phil Spector trial watchers standing in line to take their turn to kick a lady known as Punkin Pie who gave evidence for the defence and who testified that the dead girl Lana Clarkson had been very upset because she had been diss’d by famous movie director Michael Bay (a 2.37m Google hitter) at a party. Punkin deserves a good kicking for having been caught out in a gigantic lie about not being able to remember that she had originally blamed Spector for Lana’s death. But that does not mean that everything she said in the witness box is untrue. The party incident has the ring of truth.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Spector Trial | 2 Comments »